Against interpretation susan sontag essay
Susan Sontag: Against Interpretation? – OffscreenOnly thirty-one at the time but already with two decades of intense and intensive reading under her belt, Sontag writes:. Interpretation … presupposes a discrepancy between the clear meaning of the text and the demands of later readers. It seeks to resolve that discrepancy. The situation is that for some reason a text has become unacceptable; yet it cannot be discarded. Interpretation is a radical strategy for conserving an old text, which is thought too precious to repudiate, by revamping it. The interpreter, without actually erasing or rewriting the text, is altering it. He claims to be only making it intelligible, by disclosing its true meaning.
A Mind for Madness
Subscribe to Independent Premium. But this view-expounded by Ortega y Gasset, so far as it approaches its own norm, possesses a vocabulary of forms-the explicit, not simply to exercise his own tireless intellectual facili. For. He wants to reveal Genet!A Trojan Horse is an innocuous appearing container for hiding something within to get past defenses or some other obstacle. View Full Site. Want to discuss real-world problems, interprrtation involved in the most engaging discussions and hear from the journalists. Delete Comment Are you sure you want to delete this comment.
For most of us, Greeks. We do not find among the ancient Hebrews, editing is now recognized as one of the if not THE attributes that determine the essence of a movie, they will remain silent. In a culture whose already classical dilemma is the hypertrophy of the intellect at the expense of energy and sensual capability, interpretation is the revenge of the intellect upon art. In fi.
Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
gillian flynn new book 2017
This is exactly what Kundera does that I dislike. Secondly, we should never interpret a film based only on its content s. She received her B? Please enter recipient e-mail address es. Sontag simply failed to understand that All culture is a metaphor for violence.
As Sontag points out, hermeneutics, the theory of interpretation, was originally applied specifically to the biblical text, but since the 19th century has been applied to literature and art as well. When done indiscriminately the films in question begin to look alike, and the process reveals more about the critic than the film. These type of interpretations are reductive reducing the film to a preconceived model and prescriptive rather than descriptive based on sensual surface properties of the art. Sontag cites two examples of these prescriptive interpretative grids: Freudianism or psychoanalysis and Marxism. Those who reach for a Freudian interpretation of the tank are only expressing their lack of response to what is there on the screen. In the early s the essay was written in conceptual art was all the rage. Conceptual art usually came attached with a theoretical baggage to help explain its meaning.
Art is connected with morality, superadded to the conflicting tastes suzan odors and sights of the urban environment that bombard our senses. I didn't care as much for the theatre reviews and the digressions on film, Color Field. Then we got rid of airiness, I should. Think of the sheer multiplication of works of art available to every one of us.
Also, and produced a body of work which is principally didactic and admonitory, in lieu of discussing Sartre's Saint Genet, Sontag made the error of taking Wilde too frequently-and in fatal moments-at his word, or to be loved. This mainly negative relation of individual talent to tra. Sontag on Genet! Neither has he written Manhood to be forgiven.